"God was with us"

After winning the BCS National Championship game, Gene Chizik, head coach of the Auburn Tigers, said in his post game field interview, “God was with us . . .”

Immediately I was saddened.

I realize Gene Chizik is not trying to create a controversial statement or start a theological debate. I’m aware that January 10 will be one of the greatest days of his life, and in the moment of one of the biggest accomplishments of his career, he had the presence of mind to recognize the interplay between divinity and humanity. On one level I’m impressed by this attempt at humility, yet theologically speaking, I balk at it too.

Coach Chizik is correct in that God was with him and his team. We worship a God who is both transcendent and immanent. Transcendence is the attribute given to God which refers to God being wholly other, separate from creation, constantly ‘above’ the universe. Immanence is the attribute given to God which refers to God being wholly present, fully involved, constantly ‘within’ the universe. I’m sure when Chizik called out across the world that “God was with us” somewhere in his mind he was thinking of this theological paradox – surely.

Yet, theologically speaking, I profoundly disagree with the context in which Chizik spoke these simple words. To think God aided Auburn and abated Oregon is ludicrous. It suggests God has favorites, God chooses sides, and God’s greatest concern is on Western, American, college football.

As an ordained, Baptist minister and an orator of the salvific nature of the Triune God, I find it quite hard to go against verses like Acts 10:34 which say, “God shows no partiality or favoritism.” This statement is spoken by Peter and repeated again by Paul in Romans 2.

Chizik’s slip-of-the-tongue is yet another banal example of American-religious rhetoric. It reflects Western Christianity’s narrow scope of God’s influence, love, attention, and care. We, in America, don’t think enough about God’s global concerns. If we did then we wouldn’t treat God like a primordial bookie.

I fear the American-religious focus is solely on how God intervenes in our lives instead of how we can partner with God in the ongoing creation, ongoing redemption, and ongoing struggle of the world.

Our scope is too narrow. We think God is more concerned about the over/under of a game than we do about the Sudanese, the war in Korea, the babies in Haiti, the flood relief in Pakistan, America setting an all-time high for anti-depressant prescriptions, millions dying from preventable diseases like malaria, or the trafficked children of West Africa.

My point is God does care about us in the West. God does care about our happiness and our accomplishments, but God also cares about the Oregon Ducks, their depression, their self-esteem, as well as the Sudanese, the war in Korea, the babies in Haiti, flood relief in Pakistan, the depressed, diseased-ridden countries, and the trafficked children of West Africa.

I’m not mad at Chizik. I’m mad that American-religious rhetoric isn’t better. It’s time for our religious rhetoric to start speaking more globally instead of so locally.

Comments

Lee Prophitt said…
Amen, my friend. Every time I hear an athlete say the following: "I want to first thank God...", I cringe. And then I feel guilty, because who am I to question their religious expression. But it has become culturally relevant to imagine that God cares more about one team or individual's desire to win than the opposing team or individual's desire to do the same. If one has much and is successful, one is "blessed." Does this suggest that God chooses some to bless and not others? It is a very narrow view of God...a God who is petty, sometimes mean and plays favorites. Wait, that sounds more like humanity. Plus, Chizek is wrong because we all know God bleeds orange and blue.
January 12, 2011 at 2:10 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Most Difficult Parable Ever

Image
Theologian N.T. Wright finds the parable of the fig tree to be quite strange.  He says, “Jesus' warning in Luke 13 is at once amplified by this almost humorous, yet in fact quite sinister, parable of the fig tree in the vineyard.” And it is sinister.  It’s a hard pill to take.  Jesus' parable goes like this: A man has as fig tree planted in his vineyard.  One day he comes out looking for fruit on it, but there are no figs.  He says to the vineyard keeper, “Look at this tree.  For three years, I've come hoping to find some fresh figs, but what do I find? Nothing.  So just go ahead and cut it down.  Why waste the space with a fruitless tree?” The vineyard keeper replies, “Give it another chance, sir.  Give me one more years working with it.  I’ll cultivate the soil and heap on some manure to fertilize it.  If it surprises us and bears fruit next year, that will be great, but if not, then we’ll cut it down.”  (Luke 13:5-9, The Voice) But how is it sinister?
Read more

Leaving on a Jet Plane. . .

Image
This week I will be flying to the Middle East with about 30 seminary students to tour and explore the Holy Lands. The trip is designed for second year seminary students who are seeking parish ministries. The group is comprised of several seminaries that cover the theological spectrum. There will be men and women who are either conservative, liberal, moderate or anything else not mentioned. The thesis behind the trip is to get next generation leaders together in the Holy Lands to have an ecumenical experience. If we leaders share this experience together, it will make doing life and denominationalism a lot easier later in life. I covet your prayers and can’t wait to blog about it when I get back. Due to traveling and limited time to blog, I will be taking a short hiatus from my weekly blogs but promise for more insightful reflection upon my return. God bless to you and in your endeavors. Here is our Itinerary. May 18 Depart Atlanta at 5:20 p.m. (Delta 122)
Read more

The Bird of Dawning Singeth All Night Long

Image
This Christmas I was moved by the words of Frederick Buechner.  For my last blog of the year I offer to you his wisdom rather than my own ramblings.  I hope it does for you what it continues to do for me. Frederick Buechner says in his book The Faces of Jesus: On the dark bulwark of Elsinore, Shakespeare has Marcellus and Haratio reflecting on Christ in the opening scene of Hamlet: Some say that ever ‘gainst that season comes Wherein our Savior’s birth is celebrated, The bird of dawning singeth all night long; And then, they say, no spirit dare stir abroad, The nights are wholesome, then no planets strike, No fairly takes, nor witch hath power to charm, So hallowed and so gracious is the time These lines from the first scene of Hamlet in a sense say it all.  We tend to think time is just progression . . . as moment following moment, day following day, in relentless flow, the kind of time a clock or calendar measures.  But we experience time als
Read more